NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Copatress Pty Limited v South Sydney City Council [2004] NSWLEC 65 APPLICANT Copatress Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT South Sydney City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10008 of 2002 CORAM: Hoffman C Appeal :- refusal of extension of trading hours for a Hotel can the change of hourse be allowed under a s.96 application KEY ISSUES: potential for nuisance to occupants of dwellings nearby expectations of amentiy in a mixed use zone.
Liquor Licensing Act LEGISLATION CITED: South Sydney Development Control Plan 1997 South Sydney Local Environmental Plan 1989 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 01/12/2003, 02/12/2003 and 29/01/2004 EX TEMPORE 01/29/2004 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT Mr N. Hemmings, Queens Counsel instructed by Ms J. Glubb, solicitor of Allens Arthur Robinson LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr S. Griffiths, solicitor of Pike Pike & Fenwick
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
10008 of 2002
Hoffman C
29 January 2004
Copatress Pty Ltd Applicant v
South Sydney City Council Respondent
Judgment
1. This was a class 1 appeal no 10008 of 2002 between Copatress Pty Ltd v South Sydney Council in regard to the refusal of extension of trading hours for the Buckland Hotel on the corner of Mitchell Road and Buckland Street Alexandria.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate