NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2006) 149 LGERA 59
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : MCC Energy Pty Limited v Wyong Shire Council & Ors [2006] NSWLEC 581
APPLICANT MCC Energy Pty Limited
FIRST RESPONDENT Wyong Shire Council PARTIES : SECOND RESPONDENT Scott James Ford
THIRD RESPONDENT Lorraine Gayle Ford
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40083 of 2006
CORAM: Jagot J
KEY ISSUES: Judicial Review :- Development consent - whether manifestly unreasonable - absence or inadequacy of statement of environmental effects - no requirement for expert assistance to assess view impacts and other matters - relevant considerations - breaches of development control plan
Development Control Plan No. 70 – Notification of Development Proposals Development Control Plan No. 99 – Building Lines LEGISLATION CITED: Development Control Plan No. 100 – Quality Housing Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 78A, s 79C, s 80(1) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 cl 50, cl 51, cl 54, cl 246, cl 247, cl 255 Wyong Local Environmental Plan 1991
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Limited v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223; Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1; Calleja v Botany Bay City Council (2005) 142 LGERA 104; Country Energy v Williams (2005) 141 LGERA 426; Cranky Rock Road Action Group Inc v Cowra Shire Council and Others (2005) 143 LGERA 356; Guthega Development Pty Ltd v Minister Administering the National Parks and Wildlife Act (NSW) 1974 (1986) 7 NSWLR 353; Hill v Woollahra Municipal Council and Others (2003) 127 LGERA 7; Hortis v Manly Council and Another (1999) 104 LGERA 43; Jungar Holdings Pty Ltd v Eurobodalla Shire Council and Dublee Holdings Pty Ltd (1989) 70 LGRA 79; Kindimindi Investments Pty Ltd v Lane Cove Council and Another (2006) 143 LGERA 277; Manly Council v Hortis and Another (2001) 113 LGERA 321; MCC Energy Pty Ltd v Wyong Shire Council and Others (2004) 132 LGERA 267; Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Another v Peko-Wallsend Limited and Others (1986) 162 CLR 24; Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang and Others (1996) 185 CLR 259; Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2002) 209 CLR 533; CASES CITED: Minister for Local Government and Another v South Sydney City Council (2002) 55 NSWLR 381; North Sydney Council v Ligon 302 Pty Ltd [No 2] (1996) 93 LGERA 23; Parramatta City Council and Another v Hale and Others (1982) 47 LGRA 319; Project Blue Sky Inc and Others v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; Pyramid Pacific Pty Limited v Ku-ring-gai Council [2006] NSWLEC 522; R v Hillingdon London Borough Council; ex parte Puhlhofer [1986] AC 484; Save Our Street Incorporated v Settree [2006] NSWLEC 570; Schroders Australia Property Management Ltd v Shoalhaven City Council and Another (1999) 110 LGERA 130; Schroders Australia Property Management Ltd v Shoalhaven City Council and Anor [2001] NSWCA 74; Segal and Another v Waverley Council (2005) 64 NSWLR 177; Somerville v Dalby and Others (1990) 69 LGRA 422; Telstra Corporation Ltd and Another v Hurstville City Council and Others (2002) 118 FCR 198; Tenacity Consulting v Warringah Council [2004] NSWLEC 140; The Council of the City of Parramatta v Pestell (1972) 128 CLR 305; Weal v Bathurst City Council and Another (2000) 111 LGERA 181; Wyong Shire Council v MCC Energy Pty Ltd (2005) 139 LGERA 296; Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 51 NSWLR 589
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate