NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hanna v Hurstville CC [2005] NSWLEC 730
APPLICANT Tony Hanna
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Hurstville City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10437 of 2005
CORAM: Murrell C
Development Application :- Refusal of a childcare centre - placement for 60 children - streetscape - noise - drainage - parking - signage and landscaping. KEY ISSUES:
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 State Environmental Planning Policy No. 64 LEGISLATION CITED: Hurstville Local Environmental Plan 1994 Hurstville Development Control Plan No. 6
DATES OF HEARING: 22/09/2005 and 31/10/2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11/29/2005
APPLICANT Mr R. K. Graham, solicitor with Ms C. Bracks, solicitor of Abbott Tout
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr P. Rigg, solicitor of Deacons
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Murrell C
29 November 2005
10437 of 2005 Tony Hanna v Hurstville City Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is an extempore judgment for an appeal under s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act against Hurstville City Council's deemed refusal of a development application for the demolition of buildings and the construction of a childcare centre on the site known as No.s 37-37A Cahill Street, Beverly Hills.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate