NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Coombs v Ballina Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 294
APPLICANT: Sharon Coombs PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Ballina Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10764 of 2005
CORAM: Lloyd J
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- dwelling house - minimum allotment size - dwelling entitlement - absence of evidence - question of fact
LEGISLATION CITED: Ballina Local Environmental Plan 1987 cl 12 Interim Development Order No 1 - Shire of Tintenbar
DATES OF HEARING: 03/02/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/31/2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 02/03/2006
APPLICANT: M H Baird (barrister) SOLICITORS: N/A LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT: D P Wilson (barrister) SOLICITORS: W J Grace & Co
JUDGMENT: - 5 - IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Lloyd J
Friday, 3 February 2006
LEC No. 10764 of 2006
COOMBS v BALLINA SHIRE COUNCIL [2006] NSWLEC 294
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: The applicant, Sharon Coombs, has appealed against the council's refusal of a development application to demolish an existing shed and erect a single storey brick residential dwelling and double carport on the land known as lot 7 in deposited plan 113043, Sneesby's Lane, East Wardell within the Shire of Ballina. The land has an area of approximately 809.4 square metres and the proposed development does not satisfy the council's requirement for a minimum allotment size for dwelling houses in the relevant zone. 2 The council refused the development application for a number of reasons including the following: A dwelling entitlement does not exist on the subject allotment pursuant to Clause 12 of the Ballina Local Environmental Plan 1987. 3 The matter comes before me today for the determination of two preliminary or separate questions as follows:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate