NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Prestige Building Services v Coffs Harbour City Council and ors [2005] NSWLEC 707
APPLICANT Prestige Building Services Pty Ltd
FIRST RESPONDENT PARTIES : Coffs Harbour City Council
SECOND RESPONDENT Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10746 of 2004
CORAM: Tuor C
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- Class 1 proceedings
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules (Amendment No 8) 2003
Prestige Building Services Pty Ltd v Coffs Harbour City Council NSWLEC 435; Stockland Development Pty Limited v Manly Council (2004) NSWLEC 472; CASES CITED: Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Holroyd City Council [2005] NSWLEC 338 ; Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 373
DATES OF HEARING: Written submissions
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/13/2005
APPLICANT Mr P Mc Ewen SC SOLICITORS Colin Biggers & Paisley
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr J Mulder, solicitor SOLICITORS MBT Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Tuor C
13 December 2005
10746 of 2004 Prestige Building Services Pty Ltd (Applicant) v Coffs Harbour City Council (First Respondent) and Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources (Second Respondent) (No. 2)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate