NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Rose Bay Afloat Pty Ltd (Formerly Titanic Floating Restaurant Pty Limited) v Woollahra Municipal Council [2003] NSWLEC 116 APPLICANT: Rose Bay Afloat Pty Ltd (Formerly Titanic Floating Restaurant Pty Limited) PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Woollahra Municipal Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10957 of 2001 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- application stay of proceedings based upon existence of pending application for leave to appeal to Court of Appeal against interlocutory judgment. LEGISLATION CITED: CASES CITED: Ervin Mahrer v Strathfield Municipal Council (2001) NSWLEC 228 DATES OF HEARING: 21/03/2003 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 03/21/2003
APPLICANT: J E Robson, Barrister SOLICITORS Baker and McKenzie LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr P Clay, SOLICITORS Michell Sillar
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Matter No . . 10957 of 2001 Coram : Bignold J 21 March 2003
ROSE BAY AFLOAT PTY LTD (FORMERLY TITANIC FLOATING RESTAURANT PTY LIMITED)
Applicant
v
WOOLLAHRA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This is a Motion to vacate hearing dates that have been allocated for the hearing of a development appeal which was filed in the Court in 2001. The hearing dates were allocated on 3 September 2002 and the dates allocated are the week commencing 19 May 2003.
2. The development application is for a restaurant and public boardwalk and pontoon on land situated below mean high watermark at Rose Bay, but close to the landward side.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate