NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Harbour Port Constructions Pty Limited v Woollahra Municipal Council [2004] NSWLEC 283 APPLICANT: Harbour Port Constructions Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Woollahra Municipal Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11193 of 2003 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- demolition of contributory item in heritage conservation zone-erection of a replacement dwelling-house-impact of proposed development on heritage significance. LEGISLATION CITED: CASES CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 79C DATES OF HEARING: 5, 6, 13/02/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/04/2004
APPLICANT: Mr T Hale SC SOLICITORS Freidman Reeves
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Ms M Hawley, Solicitor SOLICITORS Phillips Fox
JUDGMENT:
1
IN THE LAND AND Matter No: 11193 of 2003 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Bignold J OF NEW SOUTH WALES 4 June 2004
HARBOUR PORT CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LIMITED
Applicant
v
WOOLLAHRA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
Respondent
JUDGMENT
A. INTRODUCTION
1. This is an appeal pursuant to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 97 (the EP&A Act) against the Council's deemed refusal of a development application for the demolition of an existing dwelling-house erected on property known as No 54 Fletcher Street, Woollahra (the development site) and for the erection of a replacement two storey dwelling-house thereon.
2. After the present appeal had been instituted, the Council conformably to the EP&A Act, s 82(2) determined the development application by refusing consent for the following reasons as notified to the Applicant in the Notice given pursuant to the EP&A Act, s 81(1)(a): 1. The proposed demolition of the subject site is not supported on conservation grounds as the subject house is considered to be a good example of a Victorian weatherboard cottage which is contributory to the conservation area. 2. The proposed demolition of the cottage would not comply with Part 1 Section 2(g) and Part 4 Section 28 of Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 1995. 3. The proposal would not comply with Part 9 of Woollahra Residential Development Control Plan 1995 with regard to soft and porous landscaping. 4. The proposal would not comply with Part 7 of Woollahra Residential Development Control Plan 1995 with regard to floor space. 5. The proposal would not comply with Part 8 of Woollahra Residential Development Control Plan 1995 with regard to setbacks.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate