NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Scorpian Securities P/L v Hastings Council [2005] NSWLEC 608
APPLICANT Scorpian Securities Pty Limited
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Hastings Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10593 of 2005
CORAM: Hoffman C
Appeal :- s 96 to amend consent - does it remain substantially the same - implications of a new development control plan - amenity impacts. KEY ISSUES:
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Hastings Development Control Plan
DATES OF HEARING: 18/10/05 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10/18/2005
APPLICANT Mr K. Webber, solicitor of Wilshire Webb
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr S. Miles, solicitor of Donovan Oates Hannaford
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Commissioner Hoffman
18 October 2005
10593 of 2005 Scorpion Securities Pty Limited v Hastings Shire Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is appeal 10593 of 2005 between Scorpion Securities Pty Limited and Hastings Shire Council in regard to the refusal of a s 96 application to amend consent 2003/0834 issued by the council for an apartment building at No. 18-20 Mort Street. The site is on top of the hill overlooking the Westport Shopping Centre and the river to the north. The consent was granted by council on 23 September 2004 and approved under Development Control Plan 9, a control that has since been replaced by Development Control Plan 49.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate