NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Telstra Corporation Limited v Holroyd City Council [2006] NSWLEC 711
APPLICANT PARTIES : Telstra Corporation Limited RESPONDENT Holroyd City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10262 of 2006
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- Class 1 - whether fair and reasonable to order costs - where consent orders entered into
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 82A, 97 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69 Land and Environment Court Rules 1996
Aldi Foods Pty Limited v Holroyd City Council [2005] NSWLEC 338; Grant v Kiama Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 70; Hunter Development Brokerage v Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council 63 NSWLR 124; CASES CITED: Latoudis v Casey 170 CLR 534; Raiti v Leichhardt Municipal Council (1990) 72 LGRA 333 ; Telstra Corporation Ltd v Holroyd City Council [2006] NSWLEC 527; Telstra Corporation Limited v Hornsby Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 133
DATES OF HEARING: 9/11/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/10/2006
APPLICANT Mr A Galasso SC SOLICITORS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mallesons Stephens Jacques RESPONDENT Mr A Pickles (Barrister) SOLICITORS Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate