NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Plumb v Penrith City Council and Anor [2002] NSWLEC 223 APPLICANT Plumb PARTIES : RESPONDENTS Penrith City Council and Anor FILE NUMBER(S) : (4)0393 of 2002 CORAM: Pearlman J KEY ISSUES: Judicial Review :- development application - educational establishment - whether species impact statement required - endangered ecological community - Cumberland Plain Woodland - jurisdictional fact - opinion evidence - whether ecological community exists on site - whether development likely to significantly affect ecological community - application of the eight part test Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4(1), s 5A, s 78A(8)(b) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 cl 5, cl 87, cl 88 LEGISLATION CITED: National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 div 1B of pt 4 Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 30 - St Marys cl 20(1)(a), cl 37 Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 s 4(1), s 6(3), s 12, s 15, pt 3 sch 1 Carstens v Pittwater Council (1999) 111 LGERA 1; Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission and Anor (1999) 199 CLR 135; CASES CITED: Helman v Byron Shire Council and Anor (1995) 87 LGERA 349; Masterbuilt Pty Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 170; Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL (1999) 46 NSWLR 55 DATES OF HEARING: 22/10/2002; 23/10/2002; 24/10/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/02/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate