NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2006) 147 LGERA 330
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Cutcliffe v Lithgow City Council [2006] NSWLEC 463
APPLICANTS: Brian Edward Cutcliffe and Jill Cutcliffe
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT: Lithgow City Council
SECOND RESPONDENTS: Garry Allan Dukes and Wendy Ann Dukes
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40181 of 2005
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- where applicant has obtained declaration of invalidity of a council development consent - where applicant seeks and obtains costs only against submitting council and not against developer who defended – whether council entitled to contribution to those costs from developer – whether developer entitled to recover its costs from council -whether council's submitting appearance and pleaded defence unreasonable – general costs guidelines.
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) s 69 Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 6 r 1
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich (2004) 50 ACSR 500; Belongil Progress Association Inc v Byron Shire Council [2000] NSWLEC 118; BMI Ltd v Federated Clerk's Union of Australia (NSW) Branch (1983) 51 ALR 401; Corporate Affairs Commission of NSW v Transphere Pty Ltd (1988) 15 NSWLR 596; De Haas v Williams (2004) 132 LGERA 195; Develtor Property Group Pty Ltd v Newcastle City Council [2001] NSWLEC 47; El Deeb v Magistrates Court of South Australia (1999) 72 SASR 596; Emory University v Biochem Pharma Inc (1998) 86 FCR 1; Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (Inc) (1986) ATPR 40-748; Kiama Council v Grant (2006) 143 LGERA 441; Kindimindi Investments Pty Ltd v Lane Cove Council (2006) 143 LGERA 268; KJD York Management Services Pty Ltd v City of Sydney Council [2006] NSWLEC 218; CASES CITED: Kumar v Mitchell (1991) 32 FCR 190; Lactos Fresh Pty Ltd v Finishing Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 748; Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; Metzger v Department of Health and Social Security [1977] 3 All ER 444; Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Our Town FM Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (No 3) (1987) 77 ALR 609; Parkes Developments Pty Limited v Cambridge Credit Corporation Limited (1974) 33 LGRA 196 ; Proprietors of SP 13318 and SP 13555 v Lavender View Regency Pty Ltd and North Sydney Council (unreported 6 June 1987, LEC/NSW); R (Davies) v Birmingham Deputy Coroner [2004] 1 WLR 2739; R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13; Rushcutters Bay Smash Repairs v H McKenna Netmakers [2002] NSWSC 670; Scott v Wollongong City Council (1992) 75 LGRA 112; Sidney Harrison Pty Ltd v City of Tea Tree Gully (No 2) (2001) 112 LGERA 327; Trust Co of Australia Ltd v Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd (1995) 36 NSWLR 654
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate