NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Adamski v Betty [2007] NSWLEC 200
APPLICANTS Caesar & Jolanta Adamski PARTIES : RESPONDENT Dorothy Betty
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20087 of 2007
CORAM: Moore C - Fakes AC
KEY ISSUES: Trees (Neighbours) :- Bunya Pine cones Risk of injury to persons
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
DATES OF HEARING: 10 April 2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10 April 2007
APPLICANTS In person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J Johnson, solicitor Bartier Perry
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE C FAKES AC
10 April 2007
07/20087 Caesar & Jolanta Adamski v Dorothy Betty
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. The consequence of the Court's decision in this application is the making of formal orders pursuant to s 9 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 . These orders are not reproduced as part of this decision but a copy the Court's orders may be obtained from the Court's registry upon payment of a fee. Details of the fee payable and process for obtaining a copy of the orders are available on the Court's web site at http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lec/
1 THE COMMISSIONERS: This is an application pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Act) concerning two trees located at 27 Braeside Street, Wahroonga.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate