Arkibuilt Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2006] NSWLEC 502

Reported Decision : (2006) 148 LGERA 85

Land and Environment Court of New South Wales

CITATION : Arkibuilt Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2006] NSWLEC 502 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.

APPLICANT Arkibuilt Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council

FILE NUMBER(S) : 10611 of 2005

CORAM: Jagot J

KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- Modification application - s 94 condition - whether an "appeal" within the meaning of s 94B(3) - whether power to modify available - whether s 94 condition unreasonable

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 94, s 94(1), s 94B(3), s 96, s 97 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2000 Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Development Contributions) Act 2005 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 17(d), s 39(2)

1643 Pittwater Road Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council [2004] NSWLEC 685; Fairfield City Council v N & S Olivieri Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 41; Lake Macquarie City Council v Hammersmith Management Pty Ltd (2003) 132 LGERA 225; Peter Duffield and Associates Pty Ltd v Canada Bay City Council (2002) 124 LGERA 349; CASES CITED: Progress and Securities Pty Ltd v North Sydney Municipal Council (1988) 66 LGERA 236; Rose Consulting Group v Baulkham Hills Shire Council (2003) 58 NSWLR 159; Security Storage Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council (1996) 93 LGERA 176; State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) and Others (1999) 160 ALR 588; Stockland (Constructors) Pty Ltd v Shellharbour Council [1996] NSWLEC 123