NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 148 LGERA 38 [2007] NSWCA 181; 154 LGERA 437 (CA)
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Commonwealth Custodial Services Limited as Trustee for the Burwood Trust Fund; Trust Company of Australia Limited v Valuer-General [2006] NSWLEC 400
31413 of 2004
APPLICANT: Commonwealth Custodial Services Limited as Trustee for the Burwood Trust Fund RESPONDENT: Valuer-General PARTIES : 31438 of 2004
APPLICANT: Trust Company of Australia Limited RESPONDENT: Valuer-General
FILE NUMBER(S) : 31413; 31438 of 2004
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: Valuation of Land :- meaning of "improvements" in s 6A(1) of Valuation of Land Act 1916 – determination of highest and best use.
LEGISLATION CITED: Valuation of Land Act 1916 (NSW) s 4(1), s 6A, s 37, s 40 Valuation of Land Act 1944 (Qld) s 3(1)(b), s 3(2)
Adelaide Clinic Holdings Pty Ltd v Minister for Water Resources (1988) 65 LGRA 410; Boland v Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd (1999) 167 ALR 575 Brisbane City Council v Valuer-General for the State of Queensland (1978) 140 CLR 41; Caltex Oil (Aust) Pty Ltd v Chief Executive, Department of Lands (1996-1997) 16 QLCR 435; Campbell v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Land Tax (NSW) (1915) 20 CLR 49; Cedar Rapids Manufacturing and Power Co v Lacoste [1914] AC 569; Collins v Willoughby Municipal Council (1967) 14 LGRA 257; Commissioner of Land Tax v Nathan (1913) 16 CLR 654; Commonwealth v Oldfield (1976) 133 CLR 612; Department of Natural Resources and Mines v QNI Metals Pty Ltd [2002] QLAC 71; Fisher v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Land Tax (NSW) (1915) 20 CLR 242; Goode v Valuer-General (1979) 22 SASR 247, 61 LGRA 424; Hegira Ltd v Minister for Natural Resources and Mines [2005] QLC 0051; Justin John Enterprises Pty Ltd v Valuer-General [1999] NSWLEC 208; Keogh v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Land Tax (NSW) (1915) 20 CLR 258; Kiddle v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1919) 27 CLR 316; Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (1999) 105 LGERA 318; Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2001) 51 NSWLR 673 ; CASES CITED: Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2003) 212 CLR 111; McGeoch v Federal Commissioner of Land Tax (1929) 43 CLR 277; Michael Realty Pty Ltd v Carr [1975] 2 NSWLR 812; Morrison v Federal Commissioner of Land Tax (1914) 17 CLR 498; Pancho v Wingecarribee Council (1999) 110 LGERA 352; Park v Allied Mortgage Corporation Ltd (Hill J, FCA, 5 July 1995, unreported); Raynbird v Valuer-General (1980) 7 QLCR 106; Spencer v The Commonwealth (1907) 5 CLR 418; Spicer v Valuer-General (1963) 10 LGRA 319 ; Stubberfield v Valuer-General [1991] 1 Qd R 278; Tandou Ltd v Western Lands Commissioner (Bignold J, NSWLEC, 19 June 1996, unreported); Tetzner v Colonial Sugar Refining Company Ltd [1958] AC 50; Thomspon v Council of the Municipality of Randwick (1950) 81 CLR 87; Tilghman v Valuer-General (1966) 12 LGRA 380; Toohey's Limited v Valuer-General [1925] AC 439; Valuer-General v Fenton Nominees Pty Ltd (1982) 150 CLR 160; Valuer-General v Marano (1978) 5 QLCR 194; Vanadi Pty Ltd v Valuer-General (Talbot J NSWLEC, 9 November 1995, unreported)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate