NSW Caselaw
> Reported Decision : 126 LGERA 398
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Moama Refinery Pty Limited [2003] NSWLEC 144 PROSECUTOR: Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Moama Refinery Pty Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 50041 of 2002 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- whether Judge imposing penalty on conviction has power to extend time for payment of penalty and costs beyond time fixed by Fines Act 1996 LEGISLATION CITED: CASES CITED: Fines Act 1996, ss 7 and 10 DATES OF HEARING: 19/12/2002 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 12/19/2002
PROSECUTOR: Ms Cullen, Solicitor SOLICITORS Solicitor Environment Protection Authority
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT: Ms Mohr Solicitor SOLICITORS Blake Dawson Waldron
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Matter No . . 50041 of 2002 Coram : Bignold J 19 December 2002
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY
Prosecutor
v
MOAMA REFINERY PTY LIMITED
Defendant
JUDGMENT
1. Consequent upon the delivery of judgment in this matter earlier today in which the Defendant was convicted of the offence charged and a penalty of $45,000 was imposed in respect of the conviction and the Defendant was ordered to pay the Prosecutor's legal costs, an application was made on behalf of the Defendant for time to pay the penalty imposed. At the trial this application had been anticipated.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate