NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Pompar Pty Limited v Lake Macquarie City Council [2005] NSWLEC 77
APPLICANT Pompar Pty Limited
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Lake Macquarie City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11273 of 2004
CORAM: Hussey C
Appeal :- s 96 modification which relates to traffic movement within a carpark. KEY ISSUES:
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
DATES OF HEARING: 21/02/2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 02/21/2005
APPLICANT Mr P. Clay, barrister
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr Long, solicitor
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
21 February 2005
11273 of 2004 Pompar Pty Limited v Lake Macquarie City Council
JUDGMENT 1 This appeal is against council's deemed refusal of s 96 modification which relates mainly to traffic movement conditions that were imposed on the development consent for the redevelopment commercial premises, being the former Telstra Line Depot, in the Toronto shopping centre.
2 The site has a 5m wide access to Cary Street and also has a connection to the internal service road to the council carpark.
3 This morning the parties agreed that this matter be determined by way of a an On-Site Hearing and considering the extent of the s 96 modification, I am satisfied that it relates to the same development, as approved. Also there has been the opportunity for the various objectors to express their concerns to enable me to determine the merits of the application.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate