Navaroo Constructions Pty Ltd v Palerang Council [2006] NSWLEC 402
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION : Navaroo Constructions Pty Ltd v Palerang Council [2006] NSWLEC 402
APPLICANT
Navaroo Constructions Pty Ltd
PARTIES :
RESPONDENT
Palerang Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 21134 of 2005
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- Residential subdivision - Orders
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Local Government Act 1993
Yarrowlumla Local Environmental Plan 2002
LEGISLATION CITED: Yarrowlumla Development Control Plan 2(v) Village Zone. Roads Act 1993
Community Land Development Act 1989
Section 138 of the Roads Act 1993
(Class 2 Proceedings - s 68 of Local Government Act 1993
DATES OF HEARING: 28/06/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/06/2006
APPLICANT
Mr C Leggat, SC
SOLICITORS
Harris & Company
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT
Ms H Irish, barrister
SOLICITORS
Minter Ellison
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMEN T C OURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
6 July 2006
21134 of 2005 Navaroo Constructions Pty Ltd v
Palerang Council
JUDGMENT
1 The proceedings involved 16 appeals, which were heard concurrently against s 96 Modifications to conditions of consent for a 44-47 lot residential subdivision at Bungendore. For the appeal a number of issues were identified generally dealing with the following infrastructure requirements:
o provision of adequate roof catchment area,
o provision of adequate on-site waste-water disposal area,
o contingency connection of STP to town sewerage system,
o provision of a path/cycleway,
o limitations on direct access from the new lots onto Hoskinstown Road.
2 My findings on these issues were made on 13 April 2006. The parties were allowed to review the appeal conditions on the basis of these findings.
3 Consequently the applicant has decided to discontinue the appeals against the conditions of consent on dealing with water supply, fire fighting and a minimum roof area catchment capacity of 250 sq m.
4 With respect then to the other appealed matters, the parties have agreed to the following arrangements:
- the plan of subdivision be adjusted to provide alternative battleaxe handles for all those lots fronting Hoskinstown Road, to which direct access is denied,
- the location of the reclaimed water irrigation fields to be in accordance with setback specifications and covered by 88B restriction.
- the appeal against Condition 27 dealing with contingency arrangements for the water cycle management system be dismissed, thereby maintaining council's initial requirements.
- the developer to make a contribution towards the future construction of a path/cycleway on an agreed conditional basis,
- the internal roadworks appeal is dismissed.
Conclusions
5 Having considered the subsequent submissions, it is apparent that the applicant's decision to discontinue a number of the s 96 Modifications appeals, results in the original conditions of consent being maintained. Whilst there appears to be some internal consistencies with the conditions (e.g. minimum roof catchment area and minimum reclaimed irrigation field areas) which are to be installed prior to release of the linen plan (Condition 23.14) and their numeric requirements varies from that determined during the appeal, nevertheless resolution of these matters is outside the Court's responsibility in this case.
6 With regard to the other appeal matters, the Court accepts the agreed position of the parties and makes the following orders.
Court orders
7 The orders of the Court therefore are:
1. The appeal be allowed.
2. Approval be granted pursuant to s 68 of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) to construct and operate a water cycle management scheme incorporating a sewage treatment plant subject to the conditions set out in Annexure 'A'.
3. The exhibits be returned except for Exhibits 16, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 30, A and P.
___________________
R Hussey
Commissioner of the Court
rjs
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.