NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Egel v Ashfield Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 611
APPLICANT Peter Egel PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ashfield Municipal Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10275 of 2006
CORAM: Brown C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- use of existing premises as a brothel - appropriateness of location - public interest
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Ashfield Local Environmental Plan 1985
CASES CITED: Martyn v Hornsby Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 614 ; New Century Developments Pty Limited v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2003] NSWLEC 154
DATES OF HEARING: 22/08/06
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/29/2006
APPLICANT Mr A Pickles, barrister SOLICITORS Kells The Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr A Simpson, solicitor SOLICITORS Pike, Pike and Fenwick
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Brown C
29 September 2006
10275 of 2006 Peter Egel v Ashfield Municipal Council
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal by Ashfield Municipal Council (the council) of Application No. 10.2006.009.1 to use the premises at 93 Edwin Street North, Croydon (the site) as a brothel. The site and surrounding area 2 The site is generally rectangular with a frontage of 5.69 metres to Edwin Street North, a frontage of 20.69 metres to a pedestrian walkway and a rear frontage to a laneway of 5.57 metres giving a total site area of 181 square metres.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate