NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Tchadovitch V v Hawkesbury City Council [2004] NSWLEC 242 APPLICANT Tchadovitch V PARTIES : RESPONDENT Hawkesbury City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11373 of 2003 CORAM: Hussey C KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Multi-unit housing - compliance with objectives - high amenity/accessibility - streetscape - impact on neighbours amenity - open space
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act Hawkesbury Local Environmental Plan 1989 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 30-31/03/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/21/2004
APPLICANT Dr S Berveling, barrister
RESPONDENT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr J Reilly, solicitor SOLICITORS Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
11373 of 2003
Hussey C
21 May 2004 Tachadovitch V Applicant
v Hawkesbury City Council Respondent
Judgment
Background 1 . This appeal is against council's refusal of a development application for the construction of 5 villa units at Richmond. A number of issues were initially identified, however these were reduced to the following for the hearing: - compliance with the zone objectives, - consistency with existing character, - adequacy of open space, - effect of draft amendment No. 130 of the Hawkesbury LEP. - objections.
The site 2 . The site is described as Lot 1 DPP 805 370 and Lot 232 DP 101 9706, No 15 Drift Road, Richmond. It is generally regular in shape, with a 45.17 m frontage to the southern side of Drift Road. It has a total area of 2277.8 m2.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate