NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hill v Woollahra Municipal Council and Another [2002] NSWLEC 69 APPLICANT Richard James Hill
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Woollahra Municipal Council
SECOND RESPONDENTS Paul Robertson Espie and Roslyn Margaret Espie FILE NUMBER(S) : 40163 of 2001 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Judicial Review :- failure to take into account relevant matters - manifest unreasonableness Development Application:- whether the council's approval was manifestly unreasonable LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act s 79C, s 79C(1)(b), s 79C(1)(c), s 96 Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 1995 cl 18 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Limited v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223; Carstens v Pittwater Council (1999) 111 LGERA 1; Mendoza v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs and Others (1991) 31 FCR 405; Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Another v Peko-Wallsend Limited and Others [1985-1986] 162 CLR 24; CASES CITED: Noroton Holdings Pty Ltd v Friends of Katoomba Falls Creek Valley Inc (1998) 98 LGERA 335; North Sydney Council v Ligon 302 Pty Ltd [No 2] 93 LGERA 23; Parramatta City Council and Another v Hale and Others (1982) 47 LGRA 319; Turner v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1981) 55 FLR 180; Weal v Bathurst City Council and Another (2000) 111 LGERA 181; Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 373 DATES OF HEARING: 12/03/2002, 13/03/2002, 14/03/2002, 19/03/2002 (final written submissions) DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/07/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate