NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Pancho Properties Pty Limited v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 174 APPLICANT Pancho Properties Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Wingecarribee Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10072 of 1998; 10071C of 1998; 10138 of 1999 CORAM: Talbot J Development Application :- whether manager's residence or rural worker's dwelling permissible KEY ISSUES: Development consent :- whether continues to have legal effect after appeal lodged in respect of completed development - whether clause requiring existing dwelling to be replaced demands demolition or removal of the building Estoppel :- no estoppel in respect of jurisdictional fact Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 83(2), s 79C, s 97 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Model Provisions 1980 Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan cl 9, cl 13(3), cl 13(4), cl 13A, cl 23 Ireland v Cessnock City Council (1999) 103 LGERA 285; Pancho Properties Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council (1999) 110 LGERA 352; CASES CITED: Signorelli Investments Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council (2001) 114 LGERA 27 Noble v Cowra Shire Council [2003] NSWLEC 178, unreported; Tynan v Meharg and Newcastle City Council (1998) 102 LGERA 119; Wingecarribee Shire Council v Pancho Properties Pty Ltd (2001) 117 LGERA 104 DATES OF HEARING: 24/03/2004, 25/03/2004, 26/03/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/22/2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate