NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : C M Hairis Architects v Waverley Council [2003] NSWLEC 404 PARTIES : C M Hairis Architects Waverley Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10157 of 2003 CORAM: Pain J Appeal :- Section 56A of the Land and Environment Court Act (1979) Whether errors of law disclosed in the Commissioner's judgment KEY ISSUES: Should leave be given to argue grounds not raised at merits hearing Should leave be given to raise new evidence Appeal dismissed LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act (1979) s 56A Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR; Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1; Council of the City of Sydney v Goldspar Australia Pty Limited [2002] FCA 1194 (21 October 2003); Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397; CASES CITED: Holidays-A-Float Pty Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council (1992) 75 LGRA 127; Moss v Kiama Municipal Council (2003) 127 LGERA 83; Progress Securities Pty Limited v North Sydney Council (1988) 66 LGRA 23; Rutland v Shoalhaven City Council (1997) 94 LGERA 370; Suttor v Gundowda (1950) 81 CLR 418; University of Wollongong v Metwali (No 2) (1985) 59 ALJR 481 DATES OF HEARING: 17/12/2003 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 12/19/2003
APPLICANT: T S Hale SC SOLICITORS: Bartier Perry LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: APPLICANT: P. McEwen SOLICITORS: McMahon and Associates
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate