NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : George and Diana Goorkiz v Camden Council [2003] NSWLEC 420 APPLICANT George and Diana Goorkiz PARTIES : RESPONDENT Camden Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10300 of 2003 CORAM: Murrell C Development Application :- child care centre in rural residential area KEY ISSUES: location with access from a main road impact to and from adjoining rural land-uses proximity of poultry farm LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act Camden Local Environmental Plan Zang v Canterbury CC [2001] NSWCA 167; CASES CITED: Terrace Tower Holdings v Sutherland Shire Council NSWCA 289; Ingham Enterprises v Kirra Holdings DATES OF HEARING: 2nd and 3rd September 2003 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11/25/2003
APPLICANT Mr D Wilson, barrister LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J Ritchie, solicitor Kencalo Ritchie
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 10300 of 2003
Murrell C
25 November 2003
George and Diana Goorkiz Applicant Camden Council Respondent Reasons for Judgment
1 . This is an appeal under s 97 of the Environment Planning and Assessment Act against Camden Council's refusal of a development application for the property known as 1435 Camden Valley Way, Leppington. The subject site is over 9000 m2 and is lot B in DP4072234.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate