NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Cessnock City Council v Courtney (No. 6) [2004] NSWLEC 622 revised - 15/11/2004 PROSECUTOR Cessnock City Council PARTIES : DEFENDANT Wayne Leslie Courtney FILE NUMBER(S) : 50013 of 2004 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- whether the defendant carried out development without the requisite consent under s 76A(1)(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 thereby committing an offence against s 125(1) of such Act. LEGISLATION CITED: Cessnock Local Environment Plan 1989, cl 9, cl 10A Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 76A(1)(a), s 125 Dosan Pty Ltd v Rockdale City Council (2001) 117 LGERA 363; Dyers v The Queen (2002) 210 CLR 285; CASES CITED: Jones v Dunkel and Anor (1958-1959) 101 CLR 298; Reg v Buckland [1977] 2 NSWLR 452; RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620; Weissensteiner v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 217 DATES OF HEARING: 17/08/2004 - 20/08/2004; 24/08/2004; 26/08/2004; 27/08/2004; 31/08/2004; 02/09/2004; 03/09/2004; 02/11/2004; 03/11/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/12/2004
PROSECUTOR Mr T Howard (Barrister)
SOLICITORS Cleaves Mallik Gibbs
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT Mr P Arden SC Mr J Kildea (Barrister)
SOLICITORS Thompson Norrie
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate