NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Harbour Port Constructions Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 448
APPLICANT: PARTIES : Harbour Port Constructions Pty Limited RESPONDENT: Sutherland Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11085 of 2005
CORAM: Watts C at 1
Development Application :- Impact on scenic value and character of the waterfront KEY ISSUES: Precedent and Health and vigour of marine flora.
Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2000, (SSLEP) LEGISLATION CITED: Development Control Plan for Waterfront Development, (DCPWD) Draft Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2004, (DSSLEP) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 79C and 97
CASES CITED: Thorncraft & Anor v Bathurst Regional Council [2005] NSWLEC 571; Goldin v Minister for Transport (2002) 121 LGERA 101
DATES OF HEARING: 11/07/2006-13/07/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/21/2006
APPLICANT: Mr T G Howard, barrister, instructed by Mr S M Freidman, solicitor SOLICITORS: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Harris Freidman Hyde Page, Lawyers RESPONDENT: Mr J A Cole, solicitor SOLICITORS: Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Watts C
21 July 2006
11085 of 2005 - Harbour Port Constructions Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate