NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 143 LGERA 346
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Falcomata v Ku-ring-gai Council (No 2) [2005] NSWLEC 459
APPLICANT R Falcomata PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10190 of 2005
CORAM: Moore C
Development Application :- Planning Principle: The imposition of conditions relating to the preservation of landscaping or protection of existing vegetation Solar access KEY ISSUES: Privacy Overdevelopment .
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 79C(1), s 80A(6), s 94 Rivers and Foreshores Improvement Act 1948, s 22C(2) LEGISLATION CITED: State Environmental Planning Policy 53 .
Parsonage v Ku-ring-gai [2004] NSWLEC 347; Datum Pty Ltd v Botany Bay City Council [2003] NSWLEC 62; Allen & Hawkes v Ku-ring-gai Council [2005] NSWLEC 227; CASES CITED: Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578; J James and Anastasia Markakis v Mosman Municipal Council [1998] NSWLEC 223; .
DATES OF HEARING: 3 and 10 August 2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/24/2005
APPLICANT Mr S Kondilios, solicitor Maddocks LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P Marincowitz, solicitor Phillips Fox
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate