Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION : Rosecorp v Canada Bay [2005] NSWLEC 218
Applicant:
Rosecorp Management Services Pty Ltd
PARTIES :
Respondent:
Canada Bay City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10138 and; 10139 of 2005
CORAM: Roseth SC
KEY ISSUES: Contaminated Land :-
DATES OF HEARING: 03/05/2005
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 05/03/2005
Applicant:
Ms S Duggan, barrister
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
Respondent:
Ms I Ferguson, solicitor
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Roseth SC
3 May 2005
10138 of 2005 and
10139 of 2005 Rosecorp Management Services Pty Ltd v Canada Bay City council
JUDGMENT
The consequence of the Court's decision in this appeal is the grant of development consent subject to detailed conditions. The conditions are not reproduced as part of this decision but are available for inspection at the Council. A copy the Court's Orders and conditions may be obtained from the Court's registry on payment of a fee. For details of the fee payable and process for obtaining a copy of the Orders and conditions see the Court's web site at http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lec/
1 Senior Commissioner: The dispute between the parties in these appeals related the breach of a condition of consent that required that construction does not occur below a certain RL on a contaminated part of the site. The applicant has constructed piles that breach the condition. At a case management meeting, however, the parties reached an agreement on a system of monitoring that satisfied both parties. Since the parties had agreed, the matter did not need to proceed to a hearing. The Court agreed that the parties had found a reasonable solution to the dispute and acceded to the request for consent orders.
Orders
For Appeal No 10138 of 2005
1. The appeal is upheld.
2. The section 96 application dated 5 July 2004 to amend development consent No 318/2002 dated 25 March 2003 be approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
For Appeal No 10139: of 2005
1. The appeal is upheld.
2. The section 96 application dated 5 July 2004 to amend development consent No 317/2002 dated 25 March 2003 be approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
_______________________
John Roseth
Senior Commissioner
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.