NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Pyramid Pacific Pty Ltd v Ku-Ring-Gai Council [2006] NSWLEC 220
APPLICANT Pyramid Pacific Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-Ring-Gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11068 of 2005
CORAM: Tuor C
Development Application :- residential flat building whether consistent with desired future character KEY ISSUES: impact on residential amenity, overshadowing, privacy, bulk and scale, loss of trees traffic impact on Blue Gum High Forest and Blue Gum Creek
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. LEGISLATION CITED: Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance Local Environmental Plan 194 State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 – Design Quality of Residential Flat Development
CASES CITED: Lexington 88 v Ku-ring-gai Council [2005] NSWLEC 635
DATES OF HEARING: 16 &17/02/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/03/2006
APPLICANT Mr D Baird, solicitor of Maddocks Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P Rigg, solicitor of Deacons Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Tuor C
3 May 2006
11068 of 2005 Pyramid Pacific Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council
JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate