NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Cutcliffe and Anor v Lithgow City Council & Ors. [2006] NSWLEC 317
APPLICANTS: Edward Brian Cutcliffe and Jill Cutcliffe
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT: Lithgow City Council
SECOND RESPONDENTS: Garry Allan Dukes and Wendy Ann Dukes
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40181 of 2005
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- declared invalid
DATES OF HEARING: 22/05/2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 05/22/2006
APPLICANTS: Mr P Clay, barrister SOLICITORS McIntosh McPhillamy & Co
FIRST RESPONDENT: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: submitting appearance SOLICITORS Pike Pike and Fenwick
SECOND RESPONDENTS: Mr D Wilson, barrister SOLICITORS Barry E Cosier & Associates
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
BISCOE J
22 May 2006
40181 of 2005
B E CUTCLIFFE & ANOR v LITHGOW CITY COUNCIL AND ORS
JUDGMENT HIS HONOUR: 1 In these proceedings the applicants, the Cutcliffes, have sought orders setting aside two development consents granted by Lithgow City Council to the second respondents, the Dukes, for subdivision for light industrial purposes.
2 In the course of the hearing the Cutcliffes and the Dukes have sought orders by consent. The first respondent, the council, has filed a submitting appearance.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate