NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2005) 142 LGERA 380
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Auburn Council v Czopak [No 4] [2005] NSWLEC 439
APPLICANT: Auburn Council PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Mychajlo Czopak
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40472 of 2005
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Contempt :- respondent purged contempt during course of proceedings - penalty for contempt - discretion - costs
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 121D Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 6 r 2 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Pt 55 r 13
Ashfield Municipal Council v Stavitsky [2005] NSWLEC 492; Auburn Council v Czopak [2005] NSWLEC 357; Auburn Council v Czopak [No 2] [2005] NSWLEC 372; Auburn Council v Czopak [No 3] [2005] NSWLEC 417; Byron Shire Council v Hutton & Ors [2003] NSWLEC 157; CASES CITED: Registrar of the Court of Appeal v Maniam (No. 2) (1992) 26 NSWLR 309; South Sydney City Council v Hexiva Pty Limited [2002] NSWLEC 174; The Registrar of the Court of Appeal v Gilby (Mahoney, Priestley and Clark JJA, NSWCA, 20 August 1991, unreported); Tzavellas v Canterbury City Council (1999) 105 LGERA 262; Wood v Staunton (No. 5) (1995) 86 A Crim R 183
19/07/2005 DATES OF HEARING: 26/07/2005 20/09/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/21/2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate