NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Henry & Ors v Shellharbour City Council & Ors [2005] NSWLEC 600
APPLICANTS Aaron Broad Henry Stephen Henry Roy Kennedy
FIRST RESPONDENT PARTIES : Shellharbour City Council
SECOND RESPONDENT Minister for Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources
THIRD RESPONDENT Director-General of the Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40252 of 2005
CORAM: Talbot ACJ
KEY ISSUES: Aboriginal :- whether alleged disturbance of artefacts amounts to a breach of the National Parks and Wildlife Act - not proved
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974
Banque Commerciale SA, En Liquidation v Ankhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279; CASES CITED: Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658
DATES OF HEARING: 29/08/05-31/08/05
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/21/2005
APPLICANTS Mr A Oschlack (Agent) SOLICITORS N/A LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
FIRST RESPONDENT Mr N J WIlliams SC SOLICITORS Blake Dawson Waldron
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Talbot ACJ
21 October 2005
40252 of 2005 Henry & Ors v Shellharbour City Council & Ors
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate