NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Ebsworth v Sutherland Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 603
APPLICANT Adrienne Ebsworth PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sutherland Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11664 of 2004
CORAM: Talbot ACJ
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- consent to amended plans - criteria for determination.
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 39(2) LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation cl 55 Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Part 13 rule 16 (b1)
Dyldam Developments Pty Ltd v Holroyd City Council [2001] NSWLEC 204; Elali v Campbelltown City Council (2004) 135 LGERA 85 ; Ervin Mahrer and Partners v Strathfield Municipal Council (No. 2) (2001) 115 LGERA 259 ; Kanivah Holdings Pty Limited v Burwood Council [2005] NSWLEC 211 ; Moto Projects (No.2) Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGERA 298 ; CASES CITED: North Sydney Council v Michael Standley & Associates (1998) 43 NSWLR 468; Thomas v Pittwater Council [2003] NSWLEC 19 ; Vacik Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council (NSWLEC, 24 February 1992, unreported) ; Waite v Blacktown City Council [2004] NSWLEC 157 ; Willoughby Municipal Council v Local Government Appeals Tribunal and Manchil Pty Ltd [1974] 2 NSWLR 415
DATES OF HEARING: 13/10/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/24/2005
APPLICANT Mr P C Tomasetti (Barrister) SOLICITORS Maddocks LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate