NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Solowave Pty Limited v City of Sydney Council [2008] NSWLEC 1535
APPLICANT Solowave Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT City of Sydney Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20880 of 2007
CORAM: Murrell C
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- Place of Public Entertainment; BCA and Fire and Evacuation requirements, consent orders.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Local Government Act 1919
DATES OF HEARING: 10 April 2008 and 17 April 2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 17 April 2008
APPLICANT Mr Whealy (solicitor)
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms L Byrne (solicitor) of City Prosecutors Office
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Murrell C
17 April 2008
20880 of 2007 Solowave Pty Limited v City of Sydney Council
JUDGMENT 1 This matter has come before the Court as Consent Orders. The applicant is seeking a POPE, place of public entertainment, for 400 persons at the premises known as 31-33 Oxford Street, Surry Hills also known as the DCM Hotel.
2 There has been an amendment to the provisions of the legislation establishing a new regime. The transitional provisions allow this POPE to operate until 26 October 2009 as opposed to the normal two year period at which time the applicant will need to seek a further POPE licence.
3 The Court required a further report in this matter concerning evacuation and fire. The applicant has now provided a report from Mr Barry Eady, a BCA fire consultant in these proceedings. The access and egress, in particular the exits, to the proposed nightclub establishment have been assessed in terms of deem to satisfy and the performance guidelines. In terms of the performance guidelines, exhibit C provides an assessment of evacuation in terms of numbers of persons capable of exiting within the criteria established under the BCA and the proposal, while it falls short of the deemed to satisfy, Mr Eady is satisfied that the deem to satisfy alternative solution is one which will allow for evacuation of the premises in a slightly faster method than if the deemed to satisfy provisions were strictly adhered to. As such he is satisfied that the alternative solution and the minor departure provides for a satisfactory alternative for this emergency evacuation procedures.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate