NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Rooke v Great Lakes Council [2007] NSWLEC 689
APPLICANT Jarrod Rooke PARTIES : RESPONDENT Great Lakes Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10085 of 2007
CORAM: Brown C
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- subdivision of an existing lot into two lots and the erection of a dwelling on a new lot - SEPP 1 objection to minimum lot size - precedent
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Great Lakes Local Environmental Plan 1996 State Environmental Planning Policy No 1
CASES CITED: Winten Property Group Limited v North Sydney Council (2001) NSWLEC 46; Goldin & Anor v Minister for Transport Administering the Ports Corporatisation and Waterways Management Act 1995 [2002] NSWLEC 75
DATES OF HEARING: 19/09/07
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23 October 2007
APPLICANT Mr P Tomasetti SC SOLICITORS D C Balog & Associates
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr I Hemmings, barrister SOLICITORS Mallik Rees Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Brown C
23 October 2007
10085 of 2007 Jarrod Rooke v Great Lakes Council
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of Development Application 1098/2005 by Great Lakes Council (the council) for the subdivision of an existing lot into two lots and the erection of a dwelling on a new lot at 259 Cape Hawke Drive, Forster (the site). The site 2 The site is Lot 14 in DP 262992. It is irregularly shaped and effectively consists of two sections with only a narrow area of land joining the two sections. The northern boundary extends 304.1 m in three sections, the southern boundary has a length of 309.7 m and follows Cape Hawke Drive, the western boundary has a length of 124.22 m and the eastern boundary has a length of 40 m. The total site area is 1.404 ha.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate