NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hodgson v Woodward [2009] NSWLEC 1283
APPLICANT D Hodgson PARTIES : RESPONDENTS M & L Woodward
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20282 of 2009
CORAM: Moore SC - Pearson C - Thyer AC
KEY ISSUES: TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :-
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
CASES CITED: Barker v Kyriakides [2007] NSWLEC 292
DATES OF HEARING: 21 July 2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 21 July 2009
APPLICANT Mr M Muriniti, solicitor LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: L C Muriniti & Associates
RESPONDENTS In person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE SC PEARSON C THYER AC
21 July 2009
20282 of 2009 Hodgson v Woodward
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. 1 COMMISSIONERS: This is an application made concerning three trees on a property owned by Mr and Mrs Woodward at Allambie Heights. To the direct west of the property is located a child-care centre operated by the applicant and a number of others associated with his family company. The three trees that are the subject of the application are Chinese Tallow trees.
2 There are two bases for the application. The first is that the leaves from the trees (these are deciduous trees) and, perhaps to a lesser extent, the fruits from the trees fall into a box gutter located at the connection of a new carport structure and sleeping room (for children attending the centre) and an old garage structure that has been converted to form part of the child-care facility. The second is the leaves and fruit from the trees blow onto the applicant's property and constitute a risk of injury to children who attend the child-care centre.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate