NSW Caselaw
Set aside by Appeal : [2009] NSWCA 275 164 LGERA 204
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Williams v Minister for Planning [2009] NSWLEC 5 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT: Neville "Chappie" Williams
FIRST RESPONDENT: NSW Minister for Planning PARTIES : SECOND RESPONDENT: NSW Director General for Planning
THIRD RESPONDENT: Barrick Australia Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S) : 41118 of 2008
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: JUDICIAL REVIEW :- whether request to modify development consent for a gold mine outside scope of s 75W Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - whether "modification" in s 75W permits radical transformation of terms of development consent - whether proposed changes constituted a radical transformation of terms of development consent - whether fraudulently misleading conduct by proponent in relation to the modification request - legal elements of fraud - whether Minister's decision under cl 8J(8) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 invalid because Minister failed to consider a relevant matter or because proposed period of mine operations exceeded terms of proponent's lease - whether, consequently, Director-General's decision to notify environmental assessment requirements in relation to modification request invalid - whether privative clause s 75X(4) applicable.
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 5(a), 75B, 75D, 75F, 75J, 75V(1)(c), 75W, 75X(2), 75X(4), 96, 101, 119(1), Pt 3A, Pt 4 Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Infrastructure and Other Planning Reform) Act 2005 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cll 8G, 8J(8), 115, 283 Interpretation Act 1987, s 7 LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1919, s 342AS Mine Health and Safety Act 2004 Mining Act 1992, s 65(2) Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000, s 93 State Environmental Planning Policy (Major Projects) 2005, cl 6
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate