NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : 187 Kent Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney [2007] NSWLEC 382
APPLICANT 187 Kent Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Council of the City of Sydney
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10576 of 2006
CORAM: Jagot J
KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- appeal (s 56A) - procedural fairness - no obligation to allow applicant to call further expert evidence - issue clearly identified - no obligation to inform parties of Commissioner's reasoning process - no evidence - ground not made out - reasons - sufficiency of reasons - appeal dismissed
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Rules 1996
187 Kent Pty Limited v Council of the City of Sydney [2007] NSWLEC 88; Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond & Ors (1990) 170 CLR 321; Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139; Campbelltown City Council v Toth (2004) 135 LGERA 336; CASES CITED: Commissioner for the Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 ; Eastlake Golf Club Ltd v Botany Bay City Council [2007] NSWLEC 236 ; F Hoffman-La Roche & Co AG v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [1975] AC 295; Hill v Green (1999) 48 NSWLR 161; Segal & Anor v Waverley Council (2005) 64 NSWLR 177; SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs and Anor (2006) 231 ALR 592
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate