NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Wong and Anor v Neue and Neue-Bartocha [2008] NSWLEC 1122
APPLICANT Ho Shing Wong and Dason Wong PARTIES : RESPONDENT Gunter Neue and Helga Neue-Bartocha
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20014 of 2008
CORAM: Fakes AC
KEY ISSUES: Neighbour Application - Trees (Neighbours) :- removal of the two trees and compensation for removing and replacing a retaining wall at the rear of their property
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
DATES OF HEARING: 14/03/2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 14 March 2008
APPLICANT Ho Shing and Dason Wong, litigants in person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Gunter Neue and Helga Neue-Bartocha, litigants in person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Fakes AC
14 March 2008
20014 of 2008 Ho Shing and Dason Wong v Gunter Neue and Helga Neue-Bartocha
JUDGMENT 1 This is an application pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 made by Mr Ho Shing Wong and his son Dason Wong of 12 Vickery Avenue Carlingford concerning two Cinnamomum camphora (Camphor Laurel) trees at the rear of the property owned by Mr & Mrs Neue of 72 Bradley Drive Carlingford.
2 The respondents were assisted by Mr Donald Martin, a structural engineer. Mr Ho Shing Wong, who is not fluent in English was assisted by his son, Dason Wong, who translated most of the questions and answers.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate