NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Li Ping Yang v Liverpool City Council [2010] NSWLEC 1296 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT Li Ping Yang PARTIES : RESPONDENT Liverpool City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10567 of 2010
CORAM: Morris C
KEY ISSUES: CONSENT ORDERS - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :- Brothel
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008
DATES OF HEARING: 2 November 2010
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 2 November 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 2 November 2010
APPLICANT Mr S Patterson (solicitor) SOLICITOR Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr A Seton (solicitor) SOLICITOR Marsdens Law Group
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Morris C
2 November 2010
10567 of 2010 Li Ping Yang v Liverpool City Council
This determination was given extemporaneously and has been edited prior to publication.
JUDGMENT 1 Commissioner: This is an appeal under s 96(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (the Act) against the refusal by Liverpool City Council (the council) of a development application which seeks the use of an existing building at No. 12 Scott Street, Liverpool (the site) as a sex services premises.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate