NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Buyozo Pty Limited v Mosman Municipal Council [2008] NSWLEC 105
APPLICANT: Buyozo Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Mosman Municipal Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10548 of 2006
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- application to vacate hearing date because counsel jammed.
DATES OF HEARING: 29 February 2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 29 February 2008
APPLICANT: Mr C R Reid, solicitor SOLICITORS Reid & Vesely LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Ms J Walsh, solicitor SOLICITORS Pike Pike and Fenwick
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
BISCOE J
29 February 2008
10548 of 2006
BUYOZO PTY LIMITED v MOSMAN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: This is a motion by the respondent council to vacate the hearing date next Monday, 3 March. The ground is that counsel briefed by the council is jammed in another case which has overrun.
2 The position of the applicant in the proceedings, Buyozo Pty Limited, is that normally it would endeavour to be amenable to such a motion but that in this case it opposes the motion because of the long history of delay in the matter; its perception (about which I pass no judgment) that the council has endeavoured in the past to thwart progress of the matter; and that every day that the subject development consent is deferred is causing it damage.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate