NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : DAVID MULCAHY ON BEHALF OF CANTERBURY CITY COUNCIL v. SUDHAKAR RAO [1998] NSWLEC 139 (10 February 1998) [1998] NSWLEC 63 PARTIES : DAVID MULCAHY ON BEHALF OF CANTERBURY CITY COUNCIL v. SUDHAKAR RAO FILE NUMBER(S) : 50026 & 50027 of 1997 CORAM: Pearlman J KEY ISSUES: :- Prosecution - statutory offences - destruction of trees - breaches of conditions of development consent - strict liability - honest and reasonable belief LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 76(2), 125(1) Crimes Act 1900 Power v Coopers Construction Pty Ltd (Talbot J, 6 October 1995, unreported; Power v Coopers Construction Pty Ltd, s 76 ; CASES CITED: He Kaw Teh v The Queen (1985) 157 CLR 523; Power v Penthill House Pty Ltd and Ors (1993) 80 LGERA 247; Sherras v De Rutzen (1895) 1 QB 918 DATES OF HEARING: 10 February 1998 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 08/10/1998
Mr A M Hawkes, Solicitor LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr M J Neil QC
JUDGMENT: The defendant, Dr Rao, is charged with two offences by summonses issued by the prosecutor, David Mulcahy on behalf of Canterbury City Council.
The first summons alleges that on or about 12 September 1996, the defendant caused development consent for alterations and additions to a funeral parlour at 447 Burwood Road, Belmore of which he is the owner, to be implemented contrary to conditions 6 and 8 of the said consent.
Condition 6 provides: "A detailed landscape plan be prepared by a qualified landscape architect or an approved consultant for submission to and approval of Council prior to the release of approved building plans. The Plans should provide for the retention of the row of pine trees towards the rear of the site, behind the proposed parking spaces 5, 6, 7 & 8 and the tree located on car spaces 3 & 4 as shown on the Plans."
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate