NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 155 LGERA 91
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Currey v Hargraves & (2) Ors [2007] NSWLEC 471
APPLICANT: William Phillip Currey
FIRST RESPONDENT: John Charles Hargraves PARTIES : SECOND RESPONDENT: Leonie Jean Hargraves
THIRD RESPONDENT: Wyong Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40365 of 2006
CORAM: Lloyd J
KEY ISSUES: Judicial Review :- heritage item - development consent - loss of view - alleged invalidity of development consents - construction of planning instrument - delegated authority - power to grant development consent - privative clause - Hickman principle - whether failure to impose a condition is manifestly unreasonable
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 76B, s 78A, s 79C(1)(b), s 101 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 cl 49, cl 50(1)(a)
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223; Brickworks Ltd v Warringah Shire Council (1963) 108 CLR 568; Bromley London Borough Council v Greater London Council [1983] 1 AC 768; Driscoll v J Scott Pty Ltd (1976) 50 ALJR 528; 36 LGRA 159; Gill v Donald Humberstone & Co Ltd [1963] 1 WLR 929; [1963] 3 All ER 180; GTAA Pty Ltd v South Sydney City Council (2001) 117 LGERA 51; Hecar Investments No. 6 Pty Ltd v Lake Macquarie Municipal Council (1984) 53 LGRA 322; J R Hunt Real Estate Pty Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council (1997) 130 LGERA 45; Katoomba Gospel Trust v Blue Mountains City Council (1993) 130 LGERA 266; Lesnewski v Mosman Municipal Council (2005) 138 LGERA 207; CASES CITED: Maitland City Council v Anambah Homes Pty Ltd (2005) 64 NSWLR 695; Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24; Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273; Newcastle City Council v Kermir Pty Ltd (1989) 69 LGRA 289; North Sydney Municipal Council v Lycenko & Associates Pty Ltd (1988) 67 LGRA 247; Pearson v Leichhardt Municipal Council (1997) 93 LGERA 206; Port Stephens Council v Chan Industrial Pty Ltd (2005) 141 LGERA 226; R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox & Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598; Save Our Street Inc v Settree (2006) 149 LGERA 30; Weal v Bathurst City Council (2000) 111 LGERA 181; Woolworths Ltd v Pallas Newco Pty Ltd (2004) 61 NSWLR 707
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate