NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Tenacity Investments v Ku-Ring-Gai Council and Ors (No 2) [2008] NSWLEC 171
APPLICANT: Tenacity Investments
FIRST RESPONDENT: Ku-ring-gai Council
SECOND RESPONDENTS: Russell and Angela Cooke
THIRD RESPONDENTS: Vicki and Daniel Ming
FOURTH RESPONDENT: Peter Dobrijevic
FIFTH RESPONDENT: Yvonne Forsyth
PARTIES : SIXTH RESPONDENTS: Ivan and Janet Lum
SEVENTH RESPONDENTS: John and Virginia Hill
EIGHTH RESPONDENTS: Christopher and Aini Wong
NINTH RESPONDENTS: Patrick Lee and Liza Lam
TENTH RESPONDENT: Marina Brun-Smits
ELEVENTH RESPONDENTS: Gavin and Lynn Hucker
TWELFTH RESPONDENTS: Steven and Gum You; Kwok and Sylvia Ng
FILE NUMBER(S) : 30688 of 2006
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- exercise of discretion whether to make costs order in accordance with s 40(8) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 - whether applicant for easement entitled to indemnity costs - whether respondents acted unreasonably in the litigation
Civil Procedure Act 2005 Conveyancing Act 1919 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s40 LEGISLATION CITED: Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 Local Government Act 1993 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate