NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Birdon Contracting Pty Limited v Hawkesbury City Council [2009] NSWLEC 1395
APPLICANT Birdon Contracting Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Hawkesbury City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11133 of 2008
CORAM: Brown C
KEY ISSUES: CONSENT ORDERS :- modification application - extraction of sand - objections - whether substantially the same development - whether designated development
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2000
CASES CITED: Moto Projects (No 2) Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGERA 298
DATES OF HEARING: 17,18 August 2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 18 August 2009
APPLICANT Mr J Webster SC SOLICITORS Russell C Byrnes Solicitors LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr S Griffiths, solicitor SOLICITORS Pikes Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Brown C
18 August 2009
11133 of 2008 Birdon Contracting Pty Limited v Hawkesbury City Council
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: This matter comes before the Court for consent orders in relation to an application to modify development consent DA 013/95 for the extraction of sand at Lot 2 DP 628806, 6102 Singleton Road, Colo Heights. 2 Development consent DA 013/95, in general terms, provides for: o a maximum extraction of 2 million tonnes of sand, o a maximum sand extraction of 100,000 tonnes annually, o a lifespan of 25 years, with consent lapsing on 23 December 2021, o truck movements between 8 and 16 daily, and o a final landform to allow grazing and a large dam. The proposed modifications 3 The application proposes to modify conditions 1, 2, and B3.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate