NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 174 LGERA 184
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Shoalhaven City Council v South Coast Concrete Crushing & Recycling Pty Ltd [2010] NSWLEC 80
APPLICANT Shoalhaven City Council
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT South Coast Concrete Crushing & Recycling Pty Ltd
SECOND RESPONDENT Abib Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40630 of 2008
CORAM: Pepper J
KEY ISSUES: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- costs where there has been a supervening event - whether a hearing on the merits where findings made but no relief ordered - whether disentitling conduct - whether one party wholly 'successful' - respondent to pay applicant's costs
Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 98 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Pt 3A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 rr 28.2 and 42.1
F & D Bonaccorso Pty Ltd v City of Canada Bay Council (No 5) [2008] NSWLEC 235 Kiama v Grant (2006) 143 LGERA 441 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Normans Plant Hire Pty Limited v South Coast Concrete Crushing & Recycling Pty Limited [2006] NSWLEC 390 CASES CITED: Normans Plant Hire Pty Limited v South Coast Concrete Crushing & Recycling Pty Limited (No 2) [2006] NSWLEC 734 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1988) 193 CLR 72 Pittwater Council v Bolitho [2007] NSWLEC 355 Re The Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622 Shoalhaven City Council v South Coast Concrete Crushing & Recycling Pty Ltd [2009] NSWLEC 197 Warringah Shire Council v Sedevcic (1986) 57 LGERA 335
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate