NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : De Stoop v Ku-ring-gai Council [2009] NSWLEC 28 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT Lindy de Stoop PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10352 of 2008
CORAM: Sheahan J
KEY ISSUES: QUESTION OF LAW :- Preliminary question arising in Class 1 appeal; construction of provisions in local and State instruments; is a SEPP 1 objection required
Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 194 Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 200 LEGISLATION CITED: Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance State Environmental Planning Policy 1 State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004
Friends of Pryor Park Incorporated v Ryde Council & Anor [1995] NSWLEC 160 Keay & Anor v Wollongong City Council [2008] NSWLEC 243 CASES CITED: Matic v Mid-Western Regional Council [2008] NSWLEC 113 North Sydney Council v Phillip Perrie and Associates Pty Limited [1995] NSWLEC 115 T C Punnett & Associates Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [2001] NSWLEC 152, (2001) 115 LGERA 314
DATES OF HEARING: 27 October 2008
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16 March 2009
APPLICANT Ms S Duggan SOLICITORS Pike Pike & Fenwick LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J Ayling SC with Mr A Pickles SOLICITORS HWL Ebsworth
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate