NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Smith v Miller [2010] NSWLEC 1063
APPLICANT Richard and Gail Smith PARTIES : RESPONDENTS Ian and Marylyn Miller
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20008 of 2010
CORAM: Fakes C
TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :- Damage to property KEY ISSUES: Injury to persons Appeal to remove tree dismissed
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592 CASES CITED: Black v Johnson (no 2) NSWLEC 513 Barker v Kyriakides [2007] NSWLEC 292
DATES OF HEARING: 22/03/10
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 22 March 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 22 March 2010
APPLICANT Richard and Gail Smith [litigants in person] LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Ian and Marylyn Miller [litigants in person]
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Fakes C
22 March 2010
20008 of 2010 Smith v Miller
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an application pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Act) made by Mr and Mrs Smith of 35 White Cedar Drive against the owners of a tree growing at 33 White Cedar Drive. The owners of that property are Mr and Mrs Miller.
2 The applicants are seeking the removal of a mature Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum) as they contend that the tree has caused, and could continue to cause, damage to their property and is a risk of injury to persons.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate