NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Fotoulis v Taylor [2009] NSWLEC 1179
APPLICANT Peter Fotoulis PARTIES : RESPONDENT John and Miro Taylor
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20176 of 2009
CORAM: Fakes AC
KEY ISSUES: TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :- removal of the trees, damage to property, cause injury to persons
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
DATES OF HEARING: 29 May 2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 29 May 2009
APPLICANT Mr P Fotoulis (Litigant in Person) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr J and M Taylor, (Litigants in Person)
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Fakes AC 29 May 2009
20176 of 2009 Peter Fotoulis v John and Miro Taylor
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
1 ACTING COMMISSIONER: This is an application pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 made by Peter Fotoulis who owns a property that he rents at 25 Nundah Place Woronora against the owners of three trees growing at 29 Nundah Place. That property is owned by John and Miro Taylor. The trees are two Corymbia citriodora (Lemon-scented Gum) and one Angophora costata (Smooth-barked Apple). [The gums have bark that is more typical of the related C. maculata or Spotted Gum, but the leaves and the fruit are more typical of Lemon-scented Gum.]
2 The applicant is seeking the removal of the trees. He is concerned that the largest of the trees (tree 1 – Lemon-scented Gum) has caused damage to his property and will continue to do so. He is also concerned that a possible structural problem in the upper canopy of the tree that was identified in an arborist's report could fail and cause injury to anyone in the house. He is concerned that the other two trees, tree 2 another Lemon-scented Gum and tree 3 the Angophora, are growing close together and are both leaning towards his house. He fears they may fall onto his house sometime in the future thus causing damage and or injury. All trees are to the north of the applicant's property.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate