NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Martin v State of NSW [2010] NSWLEC 247
APPLICANT: Anthony Gilbert Martin
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT: State of NSW
SECOND RESPONDENT: Central West Scientific Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S) : 80004 of 2010
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- judicial review proceedings in class 8 of the Court's jurisdiction challenging the validity of an exploration licence – applicant's motion that the action be heard by a judge, that the respondent State of NSW show cause why it should not be charged with contempt, that the applicant have leave to file summary judgment, alternatively that the respondents give discovery, and that the Crown Solicitor (acting for the first respondent) file and serve his authority from the Attorney-General to draft points of defence – motion dismissed except re discovery – matter fixed for final hearing and procedural timetable ordered
Land and Environment Court Rules 2007, r 5.2 LEGISLATION CITED: Mining Act 1992 Supreme Court Rules 1970, Pt 55
DATES OF HEARING: 29 November 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 29 November 2010
APPLICANT: Mr A Martin, in person SOLICITORS: n/a LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: FIRST RESPONDENT: Ms C Spruce, barrister SOLICITORS: Crown Solicitor's Office
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate