NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Randwick Municipal Council v Pacific-Seven Pty Limited [1989] NSWLEC 229 APPLICANT Randwick Municipal Council PARTIES : RESPONDENT Pacific-Seven Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER(S) : 40248 of 1988 CORAM: Stein J KEY ISSUES: :- Environmental Planning and Assessment Act LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act Noise Control Act Fawcett Properties Ltd. v. Buckingham City Council ((1961) AC 636); Permanent Finance Corporation Ltd. v. Brisbane City Council ((1983) 50 LGRA 317); City of Unley v. Claude Neon Ltd. ((1983) 49 LGRA 65); The Queen v. District Council of Berri ((1984) 52 LGRA 137); CASES CITED: City of Unley v. Claude Neon; Kingsway Investments v. Kent City Council ((1971) AC 72); Hall & Co. Ltd. v. Shoreham-by-Sea Urban District Council (1964) 1 W.L.R.240; Spurling v. Development Underwriting ((1973) VR 1); Greek Australian Finance v. Sydney City Council ((1974) 29 LGRA 130) DATES OF HEARING: DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/25/1989
APPLICANT Mr Astill LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr Ayling
JUDGMENT:
HIS HONOUR: By application filed in the Court on 24 October 1988 the Randwick Municipal Council seeks an order restraining the respondent, Pacific-Seven Pty. Limited, from using or allowing to be used premises at 1 Meagher Avenue, Maroubra, except between the hours of 7.00 a.m. and 11.00 p.m. daily. The preliminary point concerns the validity and severability of a condition of a development consent granted by the Council on 11 June 1985.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate